Abstract: In recent years there are many researches on the "S bi N₁ hai N₂" Construction, but a few on the coercion of the "S bi N hai A" Construction on it. In view of it, this thesis, from the perspective of Construction Grammar, analyzes the syntatic coercion of "S bi N hai A" on "S bi N₁ hai N₂" and the syntactic feature inheritance of the latter from the former. "S bi N hai A" is divided into two types: the one with comparative meaning and the one with metaphorical meaning. The findings are: "N₂" in "S bi N₁ hai N₂" inherits the adjective syntactic features of "A" in "S bi N hai A"; "S bi N₁ hai N₂" inherits the non-negative-form feature of "S bi N hai A", and syntactic features of "S bi N hai A" with metaphorical meaning, such as that "A" cannot be converted into its antonym, that "S" and "N" are not interchanged and that "hai" cannot be omitted, etc.. It blocks the feature of that "A" in "S bi N hai A" can be followed by a quantifier, the features of "S bi N hai A" with comparative meaning such as that "A" can be replaced by its antonym, "S" and "N" can be interchanged and "hai" can be omitted. Among the five features inherited, three of them are from "S bi N hai A" with metaphorical meaning, indicating that it is chiefly coerced by and more relevant to "S bi N hai A" with metaphorical meaning.