1672-8505

CN 51-1675/C

林洋. 数字音乐著作权法定赔偿适用失范与制度匡正[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,41(3):90 − 104 . DOI: 10.12189/j.issn.1672-8505.2022.03.008
引用本文: 林洋. 数字音乐著作权法定赔偿适用失范与制度匡正[J]. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,41(3):90 − 104 . DOI: 10.12189/j.issn.1672-8505.2022.03.008
LIN Yang. The Anomie of Digital Music Copyright-related Statutory Compensation System and Its Improvement[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 2022, 41(3): 90-104. DOI: 10.12189/j.issn.1672-8505.2022.03.008
Citation: LIN Yang. The Anomie of Digital Music Copyright-related Statutory Compensation System and Its Improvement[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences) , 2022, 41(3): 90-104. DOI: 10.12189/j.issn.1672-8505.2022.03.008

数字音乐著作权法定赔偿适用失范与制度匡正

The Anomie of Digital Music Copyright-related Statutory Compensation System and Its Improvement

  • 摘要: 数字音乐繁荣发展,数字音乐著作权人维权的侵权案件数量却非常少,维权欲望低源于数字音乐著作权侵权领域中法定赔偿适用失范,表现为严重同案不同判和法官随意裁量数额。因对法定赔偿本质认知偏差导致其适用失范,法定赔偿仅是民事诉讼损害赔偿数额酌定制度在知识产权侵权领域的应用。法定赔偿应以完全赔偿原则为目标,以权利人实际损失为确定标准,在知识产权侵权损害赔偿无法适用时发挥作用。因知识产权侵权损害后果附带的公益性,在数字音乐著作权人无法自行举证形成实际损失的高度盖然性心证时,法官应依职权调取相关证据认定权利人实际损失,以作法官酌定赔偿数额的前置程序,且法官应按权利人实际损失、侵权人违法所得、权利使用费用的先后顺序调取相关证据。若仍无法形成权利人实际损失的高度盖然性心证,由法官对侵害中实际网络传播次数进行调查,综合考量侵害行为方式等因素,包括但不限于当事人实际举证情况、侵权行为方式等因素,在不同赔偿数额区间中确定赔偿数额。

     

    Abstract: While the digital music is in its boom years, the number of digital music copyright infringement cases is comparatively low. The reason lies in the anomie of statutory compensation when suing against copyright infringement. The judges may return different verdicts for the same kind of cases or make random compensation adjudication. Due to improper understanding of the nature of statutory compensation, the application of statutory compensation is not well applied. The statutory compensation only applies in the field of intellectual property infringement by referring to the discretionary system for the amount of damages in civil lawsuits. The statutory compensation should be based on the principle of complete compensation, taking the actual loss of the right holder as norm when the compensation for intellectual property infringement damage cannot be applied. Due to the public interest of intellectual property rights infringement, when the digital music copyright owner is unable to provide evidence on his own to form a highly probabilistic proof of the actual loss, the judge should obtain relevant evidence to determine the actual loss of the right holder, taking this as a pre-procedure for the judge to determine the amount of compensation. The judge shall obtain relevant evidence in the order of the actual loss of the right holder, the illegal income of the infringer, and the cost of using the right. If it is still unable to form a highly probabilistic proof of the actual loss of the right holder, the judge will investigate the actual network transmission frequency of the infringement, and comprehensively consider factors such as the method of infringement, including but not limited to factors such as the actual evidence provided by the parties, the method of infringement, etc., in different compensations, so as to determine the compensation amount.

     

/

返回文章
返回