1672-8505

CN 51-1675/C

刑事速裁程序存在的问题及完善建议——兼论刑事速裁程序与轻刑快审程序之异同

The Existing Problems and Perfection Suggestions of Criminal Immediate Judgment Procedure——Also on the Similarities and Differences Between Criminal Immediate Judgment Procedure and Quick Trial Procedure of Minor Criminal Cases

  • 摘要: 在部分地区试行的刑事案件速裁程序在实践中节约了司法资源、提升了诉讼效率,但也暴露出一些问题:刑事速裁程序适用范围过窄,被害人权益保障不完善,法律援助值班律师职责不明,司法行政机关不履行职责无惩戒措施,庭审流程不明确等。对此,文章提出了具体的措施,为刑事诉讼的进一步完善提供参考。

     

    Abstract: The trial immediate judgment procedure of criminal cases practiced in some areas has saved judicial resources and improved the efficiency of the lawsuit. But some problems arise accordingly like: too limited the application scope; imperfect protection of victims' rights and interests; obscurity in legal aid lawyers' responsibilities; no disciplinary measures for judicial and administrative authorities' negative act; ambiguity in trial procedure and so on. This paper puts forward some specific measures, expecting to provide some reference for the perfection of the system in practice.

     

/

返回文章
返回